¶1Affirmed. See Echols v. State, 484 So.2d 568, 572 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 241, 93 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986); Stallworth v. State, 538 So.2d 1296, 1298 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 545 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1989); Adan v. State, 453 So.2d 1195, 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Sias v. State, 416 So.2d 1213, 1215 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 424 So.2d 763 (Fla.1982).
584 So. 2d 236
King v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 3, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-09-03
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2007
1 state decisions
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · David W. McKay v. Texas · 424 So. 2d 758 - Hicks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-09-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →