584 So. 2d 686 - State v. Lamark’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 604 So. 2d 661 - State v. King (1992), 677 So. 2d 1094 - State v. Bowman (1996)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Griffin v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Colorado v. Connelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) The failure of the defendant to testify in his own defense; * * * * * * An admonition to the jury to disregard the remark or comment shall not be sufficient to prevent a mistrial. If the defendant, however, requests that only an admonition be given, the court shall admonish the jury to disregard the remark or comment but shall not declare a mistrial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n order to preserve the complaint that the prosecutor's use of a peremptory exception was based on race, the defense must make an objection before the entire jury panel is sworn.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in Article 770 makes it mandatory that a request for a mistrial be granted if the requested mistrial is based properly on a remark or comment proscribed by Article 770. See LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 5. Thus, the denial of a mistrial upon motion of a defendant, when the motion is based properly on one of the grounds listed in Article 770, is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.