Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 So. 2d 95 - Johnson v. State

584 So. 2d 95 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2017

11 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson · 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal contempt may be punished summarily if the court saw or heard the conduct constituting the contempt committed in the actual presence of the court. The judgment of guilt of contempt shall include a recital of those facts on which the adjudication of guilt is based. Prior to the adjudication of guilt the judge shall inform the defendant of the accusation against the defendant and inquire as to whether the defendant has any cause to show why he or she should not be adjudged guilty of contempt by the court and sentenced therefor. The defendant shall be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Golant v. State
  2. “of dubious authority, or, at the very least, [limited] the application of Saunders to the specific facts in that case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 698 So. 2d 1350 - Williams v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.