Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

584 So. 2d 963

Pruitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1991-06-14

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2000

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-06-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TAYLOR, Judge.

¶1The appellant, Walton Pruitt, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20, A.R.Crim. P.Temp., (now Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.), petition. The state filed a motion requesting that this case be remanded to the Circuit Court for Bullock County so that the trial court could make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim. P.Temp.

¶2Therefore, pursuant to Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp., this case is remanded to the Bullock County Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. A return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

¶3REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
/584/so2d/963 · .json · Public domain