Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 SW2D 758 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
6
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 103 Ill. 2d 226 - People v. Tisler (1984), State v. Dukes (1988)

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

20019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Woodson v. North Carolina · Dobbert v. Florida · Jurek v. Texas · Proffitt v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n determining whether an ex post fac-to violation exists in the context of sentencing, the critical question under both the United States and Tennessee Constitutions is whether the law changes the punishment to the defendant’s disadvantage, or inflicts a greater punishment than the law allowed when the offense occurred.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]s to Tennessee’s Constitution, we sit as a court of last resort, subject solely to the qualification that we may not impinge upon the minimum level of protection established by Supreme Court interpretations of the federal constitutional guarantees. But state supreme courts, interpreting state constitutional provisions, may impose higher standards and stronger protections than those set by the federal constitution. It is settled law that the Supreme Court of a state has full and final power to determine the constitutionality of a state statute, procedure, or course of conduct with regard to the state constitution, and this is true even where the state and federal constitutions contain similar or identical provisions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"That laws made for the punishment of acts committed previous to the existence of such laws, and by them only declared criminal, are contrary to the principles of a free Government; wherefore no Ex post facto law shall be made." 584 S.W.2d at 761 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.