Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · Lorillard v. Pons · Field v. Mans · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statement respecting the debtor's financial condition”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'respecting' ... generally has a broadening effect, ensuring that the scope of a provision covers not only its subject but also matters relating to that subject.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen asked to interpret statutory language including the phrase 'relating to,' ... th[e] [Supreme] Court has typically read the relevant text expansively.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.