In re Bateman’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]s a matter of substantive federal arbitration law, . . . an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not argue that the debt collection letter from Verizon's agent violated the Customer Agreement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the effect of a chapter 7 discharge is simply to relieve the debtor of personal liability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.