Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F.2d 171 - Warner v. Perrino

Warner v. Perrino’s Empirical Analysis

585 F.2d 171 · 1978

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2001

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2001978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1652 (Rules of Decision Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3612 (§ 812 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))

Relies on Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Runyon v. McCrary · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We may not rationally read into ... (the statute) an intention on the part of Congress to delay the enforcement of the statute for the purpose of settling other claims which arise under other laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Thus, where Congress has not otherwise spoken, federal judges are obliged to apply the law of the forum, which includes state statutes of limitations, to suits brought in federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “falls squarely within the purpose and reach of Ohio's fair housing laws,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.