Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F.2d 653 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

585 F.2d 653 · 1978

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
11
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Bonner (1989), United States v. Rambo (1986)

51 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 11 states

380197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Jones v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Alderman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Of course, a search of one's home or its curtilage, effected as a result of a trespass, is an encroachment on a person's expectancy of privacy and is for that reason, but not because of the trespass , a violation of the Fourth Amendment if not based on probable cause or authorized by a search warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hen an individual places his effects upon premises where he has no legitimate expectation of privacy ... he has no legitimate expectation that they will remain undisturbed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “well-settled rule that a guest in a hotel or motel loses his reasonable expectation of privacy and consequently any standing to object to 'an unauthorized seizure of the premises' after his rental period has terminated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.