Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F.2d 701 - Hayes v. United States

Hayes v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

585 F.2d 701 · 1978

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
February 2001
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2001 · most notably United States v. James (1986), McCarthy v. United States (1988)

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 702C

Relies on Graci v. United States · 330 F. Supp. 1346 - Ponderendolph v. Derry Township

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the plaintiff could prove damage to his farm as a result of the dam's operation as a recreational facility without relation to the operation of the dam as a flood control project, he would avoid the absolute bar of § 702c.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)here is no immunity for flooding caused by a federal project unrelated to flood control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.