Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F.3d 11 - Wallace v. Johnson & Johnson

Wallace v. Johnson & Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

585 F.3d 11 · 2009

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2020

5 federal appellate · 8 district ·

120200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Glenn · Stearns v. City of Gig Harbor · Rodriguez-Abreu v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Terry v. Bayer Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by no means unreasonable and so must prevail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.