Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F.3d 289 - Ghazali v. Holder

Ghazali v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

585 F.3d 289 · 2009

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023

5 federal appellate ·

110200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Negusie v. Holder · 24 I. & N. Dec. 151 - Y-L

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So far as the regulations are concerned, an immigration judge may make [the materiality] finding whenever an alien files a frivolous application, regardless of whether the judge ultimately denies the application on statutory-bar or substantive grounds. The judge simply needs to ensure that the finding relates to a “material” element of the application, one that was material at the time the application was “made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a statutory exception to the jurisdiction-stripping provision”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.