United States v. Eisom’s Empirical Analysis
585 F.3d 552 · 2009
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Carrasco-De-Jesús (2009), United States v. Harakaly (2013)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Sklar · United States v. Taylor · United States v. Rodriguez · United States v. Staples
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But where the record reveals only a failure to bring forth a claim because of 'something less deliberate' such as 'oversight, inadvertence, or neglect in asserting a potential right,' the defendant has only forfeited the claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“dead and buried; it cannot thereafter be resurrected on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the nature of the offenses, their timing, their commonalities, and the existence or non- existence of overarching patterns”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.