Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers · Lear, Inc. v. Adkins · Wingo v. Wedding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts have frequently held that, when a benefit has been conferred in compliance with a judgment subsequently reversed, restitution may be required.” Id. (quoting Iowa Electric Light and Power Co. v. Atlas Corp., 654 F.2d 704, 706 (8th Cir.1981) (emphasis in Broadcom)). He also noted that the draft Third Restatement applied to transfers of property occurring”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.