Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 F. Supp. 2d 1347 - Barash v. Kates

585 F. Supp. 2d 1347 - Barash v. Kates’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · Hutto v. Finney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “phony.” (DE 50, Defendant's exh. 20). In the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.