Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 SO2D 1056 - Hansen v. State

Hansen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Watson v. Louisiana · Harris v. California · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · 452 So. 2d 520 - Blanco v. State · 528 So. 2d 353 - Garron v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] lay witness, testifying on his or her personal observation as to a defendant's sanity, must have gained this personal knowledge in a time period reasonably proximate to the events giving rise to the prosecution.... A nonexpert is not competent to give lay opinion testimony based on his personal observation that took place a day removed from the events giving rise to the prosecution. This is clearly the domain of experts in the field of psychiatry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.