Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

585 So. 2d 1184

Roseman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 1991

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-09-19

Relies on 546 So. 2d 1037 - Richardson v. State

Decided 1991-09-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1Petitioner is in prison for armed robbery, burglary, grand theft and grand theft auto and has filed a motion for leave to apply for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, alleging that he has discovered new evidence regarding his conviction. His claim of newly discovered evidence must be raised in the trial court under a Rule 3.850 motion. See Richardson v. State, 546 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1989). The motion for leave to proceed is denied, without prejudice to file a Rule 3.850 motion in the trial court.

¶2WRIT DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
/585/so2d/1184 · .json · Public domain