Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

585 So. 2d 1196

Staten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1991

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-09-25

Relies on Scott v. State

Decided 1991-09-25

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse those portions of the defendant’s sentences which classify the defendant as an habitual offender. From the record, it appears that the state failed to provide notice of its intention to seek habitual offender status. § 775.084(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). On remand, the state may *1197again seek habitual offender status after it provides proper written notice. See Scott v. State, 446 So.2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

¶2Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/585/so2d/1196 · .json · Public domain