585 So. 2d 161 - Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 600 So. 2d 374 - Burks v. State (1991), 972 So. 2d 737 - Ex Parte Walker (2007)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 361 So. 2d 1182 - Tyson v. State · Johnson v. State · Scott v. State · 331 So. 2d 752 - Cooper v. State · 384 So. 2d 134 - Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Matters not objected to at trial cannot be considered for the first time on appeal, since review on appeal applies only to rulings by the trial court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The defense of entrapment is not applicable where the law enforcement officer merely affords an opportunity to one intending to violate the law. [ Tyson v. State , 361 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978)]. It is only when the government's deception actually implants the criminal design in the mind of the defendant that the defense of entrapment comes into play. Id. The primary focus is on the predisposition of the accused rather than on the agent's actions. Id. "”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because Howell did not adequately preserve for appellate review any error in the denial of his application for youthful-offender status, the Court of Criminal Appeals *Page 307 correctly affirmed Howell's judgment of conviction, and the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed. 3 AFFIRMED. SEE, STUART, BOLIN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur. COBB, C.J., recuses herself. 1 Section 15-19-1 provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.