585 So. 2d 303 - Alter v. Zuckerman’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · 100 So. 2d 378 - Hanson v. Denckla · 213 So. 2d 301 - Lane v. PALMER FIRST NATIONAL B. & T. CO. OF SARASOTA · 280 So. 2d 676 - Castellano v. Cosgrove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“WHETHER PARAGRAPH 689.075(1)(g), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), CREATES A SINGLE TEST, OR TWO ALTERNATIVE TESTS, FOR THE VALIDITY OF AN INTER VIVOS TRUST EXECUTED ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 1969, WHERE THE SETTLOR IS THE SOLE TRUSTEE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zuckerman v. Alter“[a]n otherwise valid trust ... shall not be held invalid ... [b]ecause the settlor is ... sole trustee; provided, however, that at the time the trust instrument is executed it is ... valid under the laws of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zuckerman v. Alter“executed in accordance with the formalities for the execution of wills required at the time of the execution of the trust instrument in the jurisdiction where the trust instrument is executed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zuckerman v. Alter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.