Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 SO2D 321 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1) · 393 So. 2d 540 - Tascano v. State · Murray v. State · 484 So. 2d 624 - Coleman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) requires that a trial judge instruct the jury on the possible penalties that attend a conviction for first-degree murder at the conclusion of the guilt phase of the trial upon a timely request?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.