Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 SO2D 397 - Hayes v. State

Hayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Beasley · 548 So. 2d 812 - Rowland v. State · 511 So. 2d 1109 - Ward v. State · 572 So. 2d 990 - Seawright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the requirement that the appellant submit to blood, breathalyzer, and urinalysis examinations accords with the provision of section 948.03(1)(j) for "random testing," it is a standard condition of probation, and under the rationale of [ State v. ] Beasley [ 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991)] it does not need to be orally pronounced. This standard condition may be imposed regardless of whether it is directly related to the circumstances of the appellant's offense, because it is one of the conditions which is made applicable to any probationer under section 948.03. See Ward v. State, 511 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Although some standard conditions may still depend on the circumstances of the offense (e.g., see section 948.03(1)(e), Florida Statutes, providing for restitution "for the damage or loss caused"), section 948.03(1)(j) is not limited in this manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.