Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 585 S.W.2d 488 - Rice v. State

Rice v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably Thomas v. State (1987), Allen v. State (2002)

65 state decisions

5001979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Fisher v. United States · Fields v. State · Crosswhite v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant is a persistant [sic] offender, punishable by sentence to an extended term of imprisonment under Section 558.016 RSMo in that he has been previously convicted of at least two felonies committed at different times and not related to the instant crime as a single episode, said previous convictions being as follows: 1. possession and uttering forged instrument in 1958[,] 2. robbery first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon in 1960[,] 3. robbery first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon in 1960[, and] 4. carrying concealed weapon in 1960[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Daniels v. State
  2. ““The claim that an attorney’s investigation of a case is inadequate must allege what specific information the attorney failed to discover, that reasonable investigation would have disclosed that information and that the information would have aided or improved appellant’s position.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Marberry v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.