Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 A2D 730 - State v. Pinkham

State v. Pinkham’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2025

8 state decisions

401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pinkham · State v. Caron · State v. Doucette · State v. Allen · State v. Ifill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to determine whether entertaining the appeal is consistent with the strong public policy against piecemeal appeals and the impossibility of this court's serving as an advisory board to trial lawyers and judges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.