Adkins v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.2d 1070 · 1978
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably Coca-Cola Company v. Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (1979), Pipe and Foundry Company v. Webb (1979)
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 7512
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Sierra Club v. Train · Holman v. United States · Chiriaco v. United States · Dozier v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“concern[ ] matters within the agency's expertise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In cases involving the termination of federal employment, the scope of judicial review is limited to a determination of whether the administrative action has complied with the required procedural due process or whether the administrative action is arbitrary or capricious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coffman v. Bolger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.