Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 F.2d 134 - Washington v. Cupp

Washington v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis

586 F.2d 134 · 1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2006

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · Foster v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “victim provided a specific and detailed description”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.