Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 F.2d 234 - Holmes v. Kelly

Holmes v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

586 F.2d 234 · 1978

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 144

Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. Sternau · Fontijn v. Okamoto · Jepson v. Egly · Snitzer v. Etzel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at most, Holmes can argue that the burden of going forward shifted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.