Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 F.2d 530 - Feminist Women's Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad

Feminist Women's Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad’s Empirical Analysis

586 F.2d 530 · 1978

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2010 · most notably McI Communications Corporation McI v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company (1983), Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau (1982)

56 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions

79019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · Parker v. Brown · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not illegal either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme itself violative of the Sherman Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]very contract, combination ..., or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Admissibility, we think, should be governed by a test that weighs the probativeness of and the plaintiff’s need for the evidence against the danger that admission of the evidence will prejudice the defendant’s first amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.