Noell v. Bensinger’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.2d 554 · 1978
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably United States v. Joseph (2013), Myers III v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1990)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp. · Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Had Congress meant that the Administrator may revoke a registration only upon a finding that the registrant had been convicted in a contested proceedings or upon a plea of guilty it would have been a simple matter to have inserted the qualifying phrase. This it did not do. We hold that [respondent's] conviction was a conviction within the meaning of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]either the prosecutor nor the District Court ... had the authority to speak for the Drug Enforcement Administration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that any Government officer induced him to enter a nolo plea by representing that the agency would stay its hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.