Pence v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.2d 733 · 1978
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission (1981), Clouser v. Espy (1994)
30 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Morrissey v. Brewer · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Baker v. Carr · Goldberg v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In class actions, the named representatives must allege and show that they personally have been injured, not that injury has been suffered by other, unidentified members of the class to which they belong and which they purport to represent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'a twofold aspect, ... the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prevent courts from becoming enmeshed in abstract questions which have not concretely affected the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.