United States v. Rudzavice’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.3d 310 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1461 · 18 U.S.C. § 1462 · 18 U.S.C. § 1470 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 19 U.S.C. § 1305 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on Rita v. United States · Puckett v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Kolender v. Lawson · Miller v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly transfers obscene matter to another individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, knowing that such other individual has not attained the age of 16 years, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.