Webb v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.3d 383 · 2009
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 6 . Alternatively, subsection (d)(2) limits issuance of the writ to those federal claims previously adjudicated in state court that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Blackmon v. Booker“establish an extensive pattern in the context of the prosecutor's summation, which spanned ninety-four pages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.