United States v. Schaffer’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.3d 414 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · Doggett v. United States · Mathews v. United States · Grunewald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dismissal for pre-indictment delay 'is warranted only when the defendant shows substantial prejudice to his right to a fair trial and that the delay was an intentional device by the government to gain a tactical advantage.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“United States v. Lovasco , 431 U.S. 783 , 789, 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977). Nevertheless, a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.