Irving v. Dormire’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.3d 645 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Montana v. United States · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Bounds v. Smith · Dowling v. United States · Conner v. Reinhard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The preclusion principle embodied in the doctrine of collateral estoppel is based upon the need to conserve judicial resources and prevent inconsistent decisions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Costner v. URS Consultants, Inc. , 153 F.3d 667 , 673 (8th Cir. 1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Elbert v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.