Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 NE2D 932 - Smith v. Breeding

Smith v. Breeding’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2016

9 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Holland v. King · 117 Ind. App. 518 - Creighton v. Schafer · Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Nickolick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because it merely created a lien in the purchaser and does not transfer title, Id. at 987-938 . Any lack of notice arising from the auditor's failure to record Smith's address in the transfer book was an error that Smith could have corrected by properly informing the auditor of his change of address. Id. at 937 . Here, the Lake County Auditor performed all of the statutorily required acts, and substantially complied with the statutory tax sale procedures. Three statutorily required notices are at issue here. The first, the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonably calculated, under all the cireumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the practicalities and peculiarities of the case ... are reasonably met.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.