Lott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · 84 Okla. Crim. 41 - Chapman v. State · Buchanan v. State · Brinlee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that a trial judge has wide latitude in conducting a trial, including the right to question a witness for the purpose of clarifying testimony and the right to interrupt an improper line of questioning, so long as he does not indicate to the jury his views of the issues in contention. (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nauni v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.