586 So. 2d 1018 - CC v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gautney v. State · 562 So. 2d 1373 - Jackson v. State · Ex Parte Whisenant · 419 So. 2d 219 - Gulledge v. State · 466 So. 2d 995 - Whisenant v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The Court finds no grounds to believe that said child is committable to an institution or agency for the mentally retarded or mentally ill. "Said child is physically mature and has sufficient mental maturity for a person of his age. ". . . . "Treatment efforts for the said M.S.B. have consisted of referrals made to the Janus Program; the Department of Human Resources; the Special Education Action Committee; and counseling at the LeMoyne Center. The child was also placed at the Crisis Center and St. Mary's Group Home. He was placed in short-term detention; placed on informal adjustment; formal probation and committed to the Department of Youth Services HIT Program. The child was disruptive while being detained at the Strickland Youth Center awaiting trial on these motions. He assaulted staff and broke detention rules and regulations which resulted in his being placed in isolation."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where a juvenile’s statement is corroborated by the physical details of the crime itself, such that only the perpetrator of the crime would have knowledge of such details, then probable cause may be found based on the totality of the circumstances.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. M.B. v. State“If a transferring court states that all six factors of § 12-15-34(d) have been considered, then its order complies with the rules. See Ex parte Anonymous , 466 So. 2d 81 (Ala. 1984); Gulledge v. State , 419 So. 2d 219 (Ala. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.