Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 So. 2d 1038 - Davis v. State

586 So. 2d 1038 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2014

7 state decisions

30199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payne v. Tennessee · Maynard v. Cartwright · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · Grossman v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “; that during approximately the same time Davis told Beverly Castle, another resident, that he was going to”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he trial court reporter, the trial judge, appellant, his trial counsel, and counsel for the state testified at the hearing. The trial judge appointed for these supplemental proceedings found that appellant was in the courtroom during the time in question. This finding is supported by competent substantial evidence; we therefore find the issue to be without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]lthough appellant does not challenge his grand theft and robbery convictions, they are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record and we affirm them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.