586 So. 2d 1196 - Baxter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 11 later decisions

states following

May 2015

most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Opper v. United States · Burns v. Richardson · 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · Culberson v. Mississippi · 581 So. 2d 162 - Lott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“from being convicted of a nonexistent crime due to `derangement, mistake or official fabrication.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 772 So. 2d 43 - Garmon v. State · 987 So. 2d 1250 - Syverud v. State
“For many rational or irrational reasons, during a criminal transaction such as the purchase of illegal drugs, a person may make untrue statements suggesting the involvement of a fictitious partner or a real person unconnected to the transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 873 So. 2d 631 - Chaparro v. State
“substantial evidence that the defendant and a coconspirator agreed to commit a crime and that the defendant intended to commit the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 873 So. 2d 631 - Chaparro v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.