Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 So. 2d 1239 - State v. Olson

586 So. 2d 1239 - State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2010

6 state decisions

40199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Pell v. Procunier · Rideout v. United States · Zwickler v. Koota · Cox v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A law is void on its face if it is so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application. Such vagueness occurs when a legislature states its proscriptions in terms so indefinite that the line between innocent and condemned conduct becomes a matter of guesswork... . But vagueness is not calculable with precision; in any particular area, the legislature confronts a dilemma: to draft with narrow particularity is to risk nullification by easy evasion of the legislative purpose; to draft with great generality is to risk ensnarement of the innocent in a net designed for others. Because that dilemma can rarely be resolved satisfactorily, the Supreme Court will not ordinarily invalidate a statute because some marginal offenses may remain within the scope of a statute's language.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “avoid unconstitutional results ... and absurd ones”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.