586 So. 2d 236 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Brewer v. Williams · Frye v. United States · Ackermann v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Because '[i]t is within the trial court's discretion as to whether the jury should be qualified in groups,' Morrison v. State , 500 So.2d 36 , 52 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), affirmed, 500 So.2d 57 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987), the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in groups of fourteen was within its discretion."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.