586 So. 2d 289 - Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We, as an appellate court, are mindful, in applying the harmless error rule here, that we should do so with extreme caution because of the well-known effect a confession has on a jury. See Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 296 , 111 S.Ct. at 1258 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.