Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

586 So. 2d 295

Montanez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1991-07-26

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2006

19 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TAYLOR, Judge.

¶1The appellant, Honorio Samuel Monta-nez, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20, Ala.R.Crim.P.Temp., petition (now Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P.). The State has filed a motion stating that it is unclear from the trial court’s order on what grounds it denied the appellant’s petition and moving that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County so that that court may make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. We agree and remand this case to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Due return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

¶2REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
/586/so2d/295 · .json · Public domain