Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 SO2D 34 - O'CAIN v. State

O'CAIN v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2015

9 state decisions

40199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 31 Ala. App. 423 - Shikles v. State · Ragland v. State · Evans v. State · Marshall v. State · 387 So. 2d 248 - Voudrie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question of whether the statement is spontaneous in a given case is to be decided upon the facts and circumstances of that case, and such determination is a question for the trial court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “" 'Generally, a person's statement concerning a startling occurrence made while he is perceiving the occurrence, or soon after his perception thereof, and while he is under the stress of a nervous excitement created by such perception, is admissible as tending to prove the truth of the matter asserted. A statement of this kind is frequently referred to as a spontaneous exclamation or excited utterance and is an exception to the hearsay evidence rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is not indispensable that the de-clarant should have said that he believed that he must or would die soon, as such belief may in the circumstances be inferred from his condition and his conduct. In determining whether the declarant believed that death was imminent, the trial court may look to statements of the deceased, the nature of his wounds, his weakness, and all the circumstances tending to show the deceased’s state of mind at the time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.