Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

586 So. 2d 441

Applestein v. Simons

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1991

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-09-17

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2016

5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Chapter 80-110, Section 2. “This act shall apply to any judgment or decree entered on or after the effective date of this act. Section 3. This act shall take effect October 1,1980.” Chapter 81-113, “(1) A judgment or decree entered on or after October 1, 1981 shall bear interest at the rate of 12 percent a year unless the judgment or decree is rendered on a written contract or obligation providing for interest at a lesser rate, in which case the judgment or decree bears interest at the rate specified in such written contract or obligation.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Lyantie Townsend, as Personal etc.

“Generally the interest rate would change on an unsatisfied final judgment as the statute prescribing the rate of interest is amended, unless otherwise provided in the basic agreement upon which the judgment was rendered.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 698 So. 2d 1264 - Keanie v. Goldy

Relies on Glades County, Fla. v. Kurtz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-09-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find error in the trial court holding that the interest rate on a judgment increased at various times in accordance with statutory increases enacted by the Legisla*442ture. Judgment was entered on the 19th day of September, 1979, and at that time interest accrued at the rate of 8% per an-num on judgments rendered in circuit court.1 The interest rate on judgments was increased to 10%, effective October 1, 1980.2 The interest rate on judgments was again increased to 12%, effective October 1, 1981.3

¶2Generally the interest rate would change on an unsatisfied final judgment as the statute proscribing the rate of interest is amended, unless otherwise provided in the basic agreement upon which the final judgment was rendered. See Glades County, Fla. v. Kurtz, 101 F.2d 759 (5th Cir.1939); Anno. 41 ALR 4th 694, § 6 p. 703 and cases cited therein. However, in the instant case the several statutes which alter the interest rate specifically excluded the application of the new rate in a retroactive manner.4 Therefore, for reasons stated, the final order under review is reversed and remanded to the trial court for reconsideration and the entry of a total amount due based on interest accrued at the rate of 8% per an-num in accordance with Sec. 55.03(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

¶3Reversed and remanded with directions.

¶4. Section 55.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1979).

¶5. Section 55.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1980).

¶6. Section 55.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1981).

¶7. Chapter 80-110, Section 2. “This act shall apply to any judgment or decree entered on or after the effective date of this act.

Section 3., This act shall take effect October 1, 1980."

¶8Chapter 81-113, "(1) A judgment or decree entered on or after October 1, 1981 shall bear interest at the rate of 12 percent a year unless the judgment or decree is rendered on a written contract or obligation providing for interest at a lesser rate, in which case the judgment or decree bears interest at the rate specified in such written contract or obligation.”
/586/so2d/441 · .json · Public domain