Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 SO2D 50 - Tedder v. State

Tedder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 556 So. 2d 1094 - Sheats v. State · 565 So. 2d 606 - Ex Parte Rice · 571 So. 2d 987 - Ex Parte Williams · McDonald v. State · Floyd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The issue of whether the appellant’s counsel was ineffective for failure to raise specific issues on appeal must be considered and addressed by the trial court before it is subject to review by this Court. See, e.g. Floyd v. State, 571 So.2d 1221 (Ala.Cr.App.1989); Saffold v. State, 563 So.2d 1074 (Ala.Cr.App.1990); Henley v. State, 582 So.2d 590 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “should not be interpreted to limit the ability of the trial court to hear a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “allegations of inadequacy of appeal counsel are not within the scope of coram nobis,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.