Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 So. 2d 954 - Ex Parte Webb

586 So. 2d 954 - Ex Parte Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 651 So. 2d 599 - DeBruce v. State (1993), Brown v. State (1997)

25 state decisions

180199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 448 So. 2d 404 - Ex Parte Washington · Williams v. State · 359 So. 2d 1172 - Andrews v. State · 50 Ala. App. 602 - Douglas v. State · Ex Parte Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An objection, of course, should fairly and specifically point out the particular grounds on which an alleged error occurred in order to inform the trial judge of the legal basis of the objection, thereby affording the trial judge an opportunity to reevaluate his or her initial ruling in light of the grounds alleged and to change it, if deemed necessary.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “too strict in its application of the waiver principle”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where the State's case consists primarily of police testimony and that testimony is crucial in establishing the State's case, the defense has a right to inquire, either through counsel or the trial judge, whether any member of the jury venire might be more, or less, inclined to credit the testimony of a police officer simply because of his or her official status.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.