Timmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Harris v. State (1989), Broxton v. State (1995)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. State · 138 Tex. Crim. 311 - Lamkin v. State · Hartgraves v. State · 131 Tex. Crim. 164 - E. L. Little v. State · Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... To be entitled to a reversal of judgment of conviction where the statement of facts is not filed, an appellant must show due diligence in requesting it and that failure to file it or have the statement of facts timely filed is not due to... fault on the part of appellant and his counsel. (Citations omitted).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Duran v. State · Melendez v. State“enter such orders as may be appropriate to cause the record to speak the truth....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.