Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 586 SW2D 723 - Maurath v. Sickles

Maurath v. Sickles’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cluck v. Abe · Loehr v. Starke · Clark v. Powell · Schaefer v. Accardi · Look v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The established rule in Missouri is that in the trial of a will contest where the issue of mental incompetency is at issue, the proponents of the will are required to show that at the time the will was executed the testator was of sound mind. The contestants, to make a case for a jury, are then required to come forward and introduce substantial evidence to prove that the testator did not have the mental capacity to make a will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.