Frank v. Gaos’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Cutter et al. v. Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction · DiamlerChrysler Corp v Cuno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]ederal courts lack jurisdiction if no named plaintiff has standing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because there remain substantial questions about whether any of the named plaintiffs has standing to sue in light of our decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins , 578 U. S. ___ , 136 S.Ct. 1540 , 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016), we vacate the judgment of the Ninth Circuit and remand for further proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our decision in Spokeo abrogated [a court of appeals ruling] that the violation of a statutory right automatically satisfies the injury-infact requirement whenever a statute authorizes a person to sue to vindicate that right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.